The Honey Bee Organization

Origin of the three types of bee. The workers build three types of cell. Worker cells predominate. Drone cells are fewer and slightly larger. Queen cells are still larger and quite different in shape. They are made singly and often project from the base or surface of the comb.

The queen lays indiscriminately in all these cells but the eggs in the drone cells are unfertilised and develop into males. The eggs in the worker and queen cells are fertilised and develop into females. However, the queen is fed a diet different in quantity and quality from the workers diet and, as a result, develops into the only fertile female.

The queen produces hormone-like substances called pheromones or ‘queen substance’. These play a vital part in suppressing the egg-laying propensities of the workers. Wherever the queen goes, she is followed by a crowd of workers who feed her and ‘lick’ her body with their probosces and so absorb the pheromones.

Swarming. When the size of the colony reaches a certain stage, usually in Spring or Summer when the nectar flow is at its greatest, the queen and a great many workers leave the hive in a swarm. The swarm comes to rest in a great cluster on a tree branch or similar situation. Scout bees, who may have left the hive some days before, seek out a suitable situation for a new nest and return to the swarm and communicate this information, whereupon the whole swarm moves off to the new site. Meanwhile, in the old hive, one of the new queens hatches out, mates, and takes over the colony that is left.

God Is Not Dead

This is the Scientific Age. Man wants proof for everything. Even for the existence of God!

But God is beyond proof. Scientists like Newton believed God. But in this modern age when we are able to explain everything, could it be possible to prove the existence of God.

Toward the end of 19th century, the philosopher Nietzsche declared through one of his fictional characters that ‘God is dead’.

Now based on Quantum Science some scientists are trying to prove the existence of God. One such person is Amit Goswami. He is a theoretical nuclear physicist and member of The University of Oregon Institute for Theoretical Physics since 1968.

Goswami very strongly believes that the existence of God could be settled by scientific evidence. He claims already it is in God’s favor.

The book has five parts, Introduction, The evidence for downward causation, The evidence for the subtle bodies, Downward causation revisited and Quantum Activism.

He offers two kind of evidence namely ‘the quantum signatures of the divine’ and ‘subtle domains of reality’.

Mental events are acting to cause physical events. This is known as downward causation.

An architect who would like to build a house will start with an idea first and then he would make a blue print of the idea. Then he will start the work.

Similarly now we are able to see the idea of God via Supramental (Body of Laws) and then the blueprint via vital body. The physical body is His work.

The author gives a number of examples based on scientific evidence to prove his point that God Exists. He shows that all the sciences – physics, biology, psychology and medicine – need the hypothesis of downward causation.

Once Dalai Lama was asked if there was any scientific research that would ever prompt him to give up his Buddhist beliefs about spirituality. To this Dalai Lama replied that if scientists could ever prove that reincarnation never happens, he might change his mind.

But Stevenson has collected a lot of evidence in proof of reincarnation.

The author himself was invited to join a group of scientists at a conference in Dharma Sala, India in 1999.

The 30 or so scientists presented his or her ideas to the venerable Dalai Lama. The conference was aimed at integrating science and spirituality.

In order to find out God one has to give up materialistic view and adopt the path of Karma Yoga, doing good without expecting the result there of.

The book has been written in a lucid style, so that even an ordinary reader could understand our origins and how we should live. Number of anecdotes are interwoven to explain the principles of quantum physics.

Amit Goswami has a knack of explaining things simply. That is his plus point.

Those who believe God, for them no explanation is necessary. Atheists who do not believe God will never accept Him even after getting enough evidence. So this book is for the people who would strengthen their belief once they get new ideas based on scientific evidence.

I very strongly recommend this book for all the people, believers, non-believers and truth seekers. The book is published by Jaico Publishing House, Mumbai, India.

Two Science-Art Philosophies – Utopia or Oblivion?

A warning to the reader: This article argues that modern science has been turned upside down, revealing the remedy to Steven Hawking’s observation that the greatest mistake humanity has ever made was to invent artificial intelligence. The correction to that mistake necessitates an up-to-date familiarity with Buckminster Fuller and C P Snow’s third culture, in which human survival is about gaining a new perspective on the unification of Science with Art.

Rather than this new perspective constituting an attack upon science, it draws attention to the crucial importance of Fuller and Snow’s synergistic Science-Art concepts. The effort to place those concepts within the perspective associated with very recent, crucial scientific discoveries, will allow for a better understanding of the nature of reality, in particular, relevant to carcinogenic growth and development.

The Feb-Mar 2016 issue of Philosophy Now contained an article by Magdalena Scholle about how the philosopher, Nietzsche, inspired Dali. Her observation that Nietzsche’s first book The Birth of Tragedy deserves particular attention by art critics, is now one of pivotal scientific importance. Evidence exists to demonstrate that Dali’s intuitive assessment of Nietzsche’s Two spirits of art, as he diagnosed it, included one spirit being an expression of an inner stereoscopic evolutionary phenomenon.

Scientists argued that Dali’s well known obsession with what he called “stereoscopic art” failed to resonate directly to the viewers’ vision. During 2003, asymmetrical electromagnetic 3D viewing glasses were manufactured and later sold along with their patent (USD669522 – 3D glasses) to the entertainment industry. The scientists that created them noted that some of the paintings by the artists, Vincent van Gogh and Paul Cezanne, when viewed through their glasses, depicted stereoscopic images. The philosopher of science, Immanuel Kant, laid the ethical foundations of the Electromagnetic Golden Age of Danish Science. Both he and the philosopher, Emmanuel Levinas, had diagnosed Plato’s search for an artistic ethic as being an asymmetrical electromagnetic vision belonging to the creative mind.

Dali’s passionately felt inner stereoscopic artistic inspiration has now been made visible and measurable, as an evolutionary process. This fact warrants the critical attention by philosophers of art that Scholle advocated. Asymmetrical electromagnetic visual observation now reveals that artists all over the world, during the 21st Century, unconsciously paint much more dramatic 3D stereoscopic images than artists throughout recorded history. The critical attention to this by philosophers of art will involve overcoming the severe culture shock of medical science being turned upside down by the new stereoscopic awareness. This is ethically preferable to the entertainment industry ignoring it.

Eminent epidemiologists have noted that an acceleration of the commercial manufacture of stereoscopic 3D information and communication devices has brought about a dysfunctional 3D global epidemic. This problem was summed up within an MIT Technology Review by David Zax July 29, 2011 entitled, Does 3D Hurt Your Eyes? Yes, Says Science – Now how do we fix the stereoscopic mess we’ve gotten ourselves into? Zax refers to a paper published in the American Government’s National Institute of Health’s Medical Journal of Vision, July 21, 2011, in which it states “The paper almost treats 3D like a strain of some virus that can’t be contained, only treated. The assumption appears to be that 3D is here to stay, and that as good epidemiologists we must do what we can to mitigate the damage it inflicts.”

The natural evolution of stereoscopic inner vision and the stereoscopic epidemic explains Nietzsches’ ‘two spirits of art’, referred to by Scholle. The above mentioned culture shock embraces the same problem that C P Snow attributed to the functioning of mainstream science’s mindset. Einstein’s governing ‘Premier law of all of the sciences’ the universal heat death law, is now an obsolete understanding of the second law of thermodynamics, which incorrectly sentences all life in the universe to frozen extinction. Quantum biological cancer research’s living information flows in the opposite direction to second law thermodynamic heat-loss energy.

Isaac Newton considered that mechanical first cause principles were “pretentious hypothesis”. Although Einstein harboured doubts about quantum mechanics’ infallibility, his understanding of the second law, based upon mechanical logic, can no longer to be considered as the premier law of all of the sciences.

In the second Edition of Encyclopaedia Perthensis, or Universal Dictionary of Knowledge, Volume 14, printed in Edinburgh by John Brown in 1816, Newton’s first principle logic causing gravitational force has been quoted under the entry ‘Mechanical’ on page 118. Newton most emphatically stated that the cause of gravity is not mechanical. Under the entry, ‘Mechanically’ he demonstrated that mechanical gravitation first cause principles are pretentious. This information is quoted from Newton’s published 28th Query Discussions, in the second edition of his journal, Opticks. Newton based his denunciation of mechanical first principle logic upon the work of ancient Greek scientists, “… who made a vacuum and atoms and the gravity of atoms the first principles of their philosophy tacitly attributing gravity to some other cause than dense matter.”

Whether Newton was right or wrong is irrelevant. Quantum mechanics and its offspring cannot deliver first cause principle logic that has been derived from the false assumption that Newton held gravity to be caused by the mass of objects in space.

This authentic argument reveals that science is being turned upside down, and it correlates with Snow’s argument that modern science does not communicate about evolutionary biological processes, because it has no insight into the true nature of the second law. The absence of scientific synergistic communication within mechanical and biological dialogue requires that substantial evidence be provided, in particular, concerning the process of inner stereoscopic evolution.

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (vol. 101 no. 27, 2004) included the paper, Binocularity and Brain Evolution in Primates. It stated that while stereoscopic vision in primates is extremely complex, its “evolutionary purpose is unknown”. Conversely, The British Medical Journal on the 6th of August, 1953 ( vol 2, issue 4831) published the paper Evolution of Binocular and Stereoscopic Vision in Man and Other Animals. In its conclusion, the question is asked whether complex inner stereoscopic vision within the human mind will ensure human survival or be used to destroy civilisation. This paper led to further in-depth research and discovery, of immense human survival importance, that has been disregarded by mainstream science. Scientists such as CP Snow, the Nobel laureate, Szent-Gyorgyi and Buckminster Fuller, all realised that this dysfunctional aspect of scientific research, unless rectified, would lead to the end of civilisation.

The stereoscopic research of the British scientists remained isolated from mainstream science until 2012, when it was fused into quantum biology by Professor Massimo Pregnolato and Professor Paolo Manzelli, recipients of that year’s Giorgio Napolitano Medal, awarded on behalf of the Republic of Italy. Together with the Italian artist, Roberto Denti, they linked Science-Art Research in Australia to their Italian quantum biology discoveries as being an integral part of the 21st Century Renaissance, a rebirth of the ancient Platonic Greek Science for ethical ends.

Also, in 2012, the physicist Guy Deutscher’s book of the year, Through the Language Glass upgraded the discarded 19th Century evolutionary linguistic colour perception theories of the British Prime Minister, William Gladstone and the German philosopher of biological science, Wolfgang von Goethe. The resulting neurological science was compatible with the Australian-Italian Science-Art quantum biology research findings. Furthermore, the evolutionary process of unconscious artistic intuition, observable though asymmetrical electromagnetic stereoscopic glasses provided for important optics research expanding upon the use of optical mathematics theory during the 1980s. The measurement of the life force governing seashell growth and development through space time, reprinted by the world’s largest technological research institute, IEEE, in 1990, as an important 20th Century discovery, is recorded in the online book, C P Snow and the NASA high Energy Project.

Dali dismissed Descartes’ science research axiom, “I think therefore I am”, writing in favour of Freud’s first principle being the “Joy of Life” paradigm. Platonic ethical emotional first cause principles were associated with the nature of infinity by many philosophers of science including Newton, Liebniz and Georg Cantor. Cantor’s mathematical theories now uphold most of modern science. However, his theory of ‘actual’ infinity completely upset the modern scientific mind, which for many years has been governed by an obsolete understanding of the second law of thermodynamics. That law led to the evolutionary belief that the living process must move toward extinction. Within this mindset, the concept that life could possibly evolve toward infinity by embracing infinite fractal logic technologies would seem impossible. Cantor, one of history’s most famous mathematicians, become the most detested one for his highly contentious paradigm, “The fear of infinity is a form of myopia that destroys the possibility of seeing the actual infinite, even though it in its highest form has created and sustains us, and in its secondary transfinite forms occurs all around us and even inhabits our minds.”

In, Beyond Infinity: Georg Cantor and Leopold Kronecker’s Dispute over Transfinite Numbers, the author Patrick Carey wrote that the mathematician, David Hilbert, famous for his development of Hilbert space, basic to the foundation of functional analysis, wholeheartedly supported Cantor’s work. He defended it by claiming that it was “nothing less than the finest product of mathematical genius and one of the supreme achievements of purely intellectual human activity.” The author of Brainfilling Curves, Jeffery Ventrella, researcher of infinite boundaries of fractal curves, wrote that Hilbert’s work was about different kinds of infinity, beyond mainstream science, in the highly vilified Cantorian sense.

The human cell changes its geometrical shape when it is poised to transmit first principle cause information, as it divides itself as an infinite fractal expression. In his 2009 article, The Human Genome in 3 Dimensions, Brandon Keim provides the highest resolution picture ever of the genome’s 3D structure at that critical moment. Its fractal shape and not just its DNA content transmits health information in a manner “which remains largely unexplained by traditional” genomic science. In mathematical terms, the cell employs a geometrical shape belonging to the Hilbert curve family structure. Georg Cantor had thoroughly researched the Platonic Greek Science that Newton saw as being the correct authority on first cause principle logic, functioning within their infinite universes.

We can now explain about Kant and Levinas’s asymmetrical electromagnetic ethics in a more sociable manner, in particular, to reveal how to obtain first cause principles concerning the nature of dysfunctional carcinogenic growth and development. They agreed with Plato that traditional art was unethical. This can be explained by referring to the spirit of Greek art being enhanced by the culture of the Roman Empire. The Roman Colosseum, hailed within Roman culture as the epitome of Greek art, in which the mathematics employed in its construction were used to construct beautiful aqueducts, carrying fresh water to the city of Rome. This was touted as being artistically superior to the artistic construction of useless Egyptian pyramids. We can argue that the Colosseum’s Science-Art form, used to stage sadistic acts of murder for the entertainment of the populace, was an unethical art form. This dysfunctional tradition of Science-Art echoes the cause of the global stereoscopic 3D epidemic, of concern to epidemiologists.

The 3D virus of concern to the epidemiologists is transmitted to the human mind through an artistic collaboration with contaminated mathematics. Through the global acceleration of information and communication devices this virus has become an incurable epidemic. The virus appears to be a strain of the mathematical dysfunctional intent placed into poker machines, where aesthetically pleasing sounds and colour images can bring about a heroin-like addiction, compelling some people to play themselves into a state of bankruptcy. Vast governmental revenue from legalised poker machine gambling echoes the structure of the global stock market, in which the world debt of 200 trillion dollars cannot be paid.

The functioning of living cells as an electromagnetic unit is well understood and its associated ethical nature can be considered to belong to an infinite universal evolutionary purpose. Nietzsche’s traditional understanding of the spirit of art is confined to the flow of carcinogenic heat death logic. Living information can manipulate its way through the infinite geometrical shape of the cell poised to divide itself, however, the flow of heat death energy, flowing in the opposite direction can contribute no relevant information concerning that process. However, Dali’s stereoscopic science intuitions are sympathetic to the spirit of the electromagnetic stereoscopic first cause non-carcinogenic information, transmitted to the daughter cell as a first cause logic communication, in the evolution of emotional consciousness.

At the very moment of cell division we see that its infinite geometrical shape does not allow the traditional spirit of art to predominate in the human evolutionary process, but utilises one associated with infinite stereoscopic inner vision.

The author of Living Cells are Electromagnetic Units, Dr Riejo Makela M. D., has spent a lifetime arguing that,“By using the closed circuit systems [obeying obsolete carcinogenic heat death law] when studying living cells, the scientists of today reject the obligatory existence of magnetic fields with electric fields.” He argues that within this mindset, an understanding of first cause cancer growth and development is prevented. He is one of many scientists that have pointed out that traditional mathematics is unable to describe first cause principles involved in solving the conundrum of how, after cell division, both cells are identical.

Dali’s stereoscopic theories can appear to be associated with an intuitive Greek logic about first principles, much the same as the New York Library of Science in 1957 published the book Babylonian Mythology and Modern Science, which stated that Einstein derived his theory of relativity from the mythological mathematical intuition belonging to Babylonian culture. C P Snow in his Science-Art Third Culture modified both Dali and Einstein’s intuitive origins, in which 21st Century quantum mechanics’s evolution of stereoscopic vision later became a rigorous foundation for the new upside-down science. Snow’s Science-Art theories, specifically different from traditional, unethical Science-Art logic, transposed Newton’s first principle logic, and Dali’s emotional intuitions, into potentially practical technological aspects of the abovementioned Deutscher linguistic colour perception theories.

The 2013 discovery that the junk DNA helix communicates health and wellbeing information to DNA, and is considered to be using an inner stereoscopic 3D language is now of crucial importance. In 2004, Harvard University, Massachusetts University and the Royal Danish Consulate, held an international symposium to explain to the world about the social importance of the message of the electromagnetic Golden Age of Danish Science. They noted that it had been mostly written in Danish and not translated, making it “invisible to English speaking scholarship.” This article is an attempt to help the remarkable upside-down mainstream science to synergise with C P Snow and Buckminster Fuller’s human survival Third Culture, in the name of Utopia or Oblivion.

What Is the Syllabus for GAMSAT?

GAMSAT is open for students of any major. It is a standardized exam held once in every year. There is no structured material for GAMSAT. It is the toughest exam. It requires your intellectual ability. ACER conducts this exam. It is the initial step of selecting the best candidates for medicine.

Generally, the questions are tricky in GAMSAT. You need to have a good practice to answer the questions on time. GAMSAT has divided into three sections. Each section deals with different subject.

Also I have researched the topic areas and a good starting point for a syllabus is listed below. The best way of preparation is depending on the previous year’s question papers. Also we have certain subject ideas about the GAMSAT. We need to have knowledge about the below areas:

1. Humanities and Social Sciences

2. Written English communication (Basically the Essay writing skills)

3. Biology and Physical Science

a. 1st year university – Biology and Chemistry

b. Year 12 / HSC – Physics

It gives opportunity to all the students to write the exam well. Even non science and ESL student can score well in GAMSAT.

Arts students can score more marks in Humanities and social science. Literature students can achieve good marks in English written communication. Science students can score high marks in Biology and physical science. It is a great advantage for all the students.

It is very difficult to analyse the syllabus for Humanities and Social Studies. You may get any question from any chapter. Also for essay writing, good English written communication is significant.

Only section 3 topics are revealed. It is enough if you could complete everything related to 1st Year University -biology and chemistry and year 12 HSC physics. I would recommend you to focus on biology and organic chemistry as you get more questions from these areas. There won’t be many questions from physics.

All these questions test the reasoning ability and problem solving skills of the candidates.

These are all the popular materials for GAMSAT. You can make the best use of them. Also practicing with previous years question paper and Des O’Neil sample question paper shall help you more. Most of the questions in real GAMSAT are familiar to Des’s sample question paper. Also questions get repeated every year.

1. Des O Neil’s materials: Large numbers of students are using Des O Neil’s materials. The guides and materials are good enough to prepare.

2. Ozimed Test: There is ozimed tests helps to test the ability of writing this exam. Ozimed is the test with all the questions similar to GAMSAT. You can practice resolving problems. It will improve the ability of analyzing and reasoning.

3. Medired: It is useful for the non science students. It gives basic knowledge about the scientific concepts. It is expensive compared to other guides.